Sony Fe 24-70Mm F2.8 G Master Mid-Range Telephoto Prime Lens, Circular 9 Blade Aperture For Beautiful DefocUS Effects, Sel2470Gm, Black

(10 مراجعات)

    Compare

    بناءا على 10 تقييمات

    5.0 overall
    9
    1
    0
    0
    0

    Add a review

    1. Maxwell

      First impressions of this lens are really good.
      I’ve done some test shots comparing against two other lenses in the focal range.
      Comparing against the Sony 28mm with 16mm conversion lens and with the Zeiss FE 35mm F2.8 lens (my favorite)
      Attached are a couple of test shots – nothing too special, I’m not DxOMark – check out their review when they get to it.

      Pros:
      – Solid Build – the high quality you’d expect from a GM lens.
      – Surprisingly light – I have this mounted on an a7rii and it doesn’t make the camera too front heavy.
      – Has an 82mm filter thread – When you’re getting down to 16mm it gets increasingly hard to find lenses that don’t have a bulbous front element preventing a filter thread.
      – The Bokeh this lens produces is beautiful – not as noticeable in the lower focal ranges, as you’d expect. But 35mm gives an even smoother depth of field than my Zeiss 35mm equivalent
      – F2.8 at 16mm is impressive – For such a wide lens having the option to let in this much light is hard to come by.
      – Very little distortion – even without correction there is surprisingly little distortion on this lens.
      – Weather sealed!

      Cons:
      – The lens does extend when you use the wider end. Not a big deal, but it would have been nice to have that contained in the body.
      – It’s not small, but that’s expected from this.
      – When you use this with a filter, you will get a little bit of a vignetting from the filter – since the angle is so wide. Somewhat expected, but kind of a bummer. Even with 2 filters stacked, it’s not noticeable above 20mm

      Not much bad to say about this lens. It’s incredibly sharp and performant, while not feeling like a burden to carry around.

      Maxwell

    2. Emerson Moura

      I have several Sony lenses and this is by far the best one I have ever used. Super fast auto-focus, super sharp images, extremely well built. The only negative about this lens is its price, but you get what you are paying for.

      Emerson Moura

    3. Flight Guy

      I have been looking for a long telephoto for months and tested virtually every other lens for Sony e-mount including the original version of this lens (not so good) with my A7R IVA. Every single one had an unacceptably high rate of out of focus and soft focus shots under many conditions.

      Up to this point I had resisted buying this lens because of the price. Finally after exhausting virtually all other cheaper possibilities I spent the money!

      I am happy to report it was the best money I have ever spent! This lens is beyond good it is insanely good and the best lens I have ever used in nearly every category. I went from an estimated 30% keeper rate with most other lenses to a 95% keeper rate with this lens! The auto focus accuracy, sharpness, and picture quality are off the charts and my customers have been astounded by the quality!

      I cannot say enough about this lens coupled with the A7R IVA. It is mind blowingly good both for portrait and sports coverage and produces spectacular results with the right body!

      I should mention it destroys the cheaper shorter range 70-180mm from a competing manufacturer.

      Also be careful listening to biased influencers that profit financially or from receiving early access to new products. They may claim “the video is not sponsored” but receiving early (often pre-production) access to hot new products can also benefit them in terms of video views. What do you think happens to the early access a manufacturer gives them if their last product review was negative?

      Bottom line is I do not write many glowing reviews but after spending a few weeks doing shoots with this lens I could not be happier!

      Flight Guy

    4. Lucybella

      I love this lens. As a Sony shooter for many years, I have a new favorite lens- this one. It’s fairly lightweight for the wide aperture and the photos it renders are really wonderful. It’s helped me take my photography to new levels. I bought it especially for the dark winters we have in Alaska and that wide aperture allows for more light and better photos of wildlife and birds. My only regret is that I didn’t buy it sooner.

      Lucybella

    5. The Opinionated Realist<span class="a-icon a-profile-verified-badge"><span class="a-profile-verified-text">

      Sony has really set a new precedent with their GM glass and this really showcases it. They’ve somehow figured out how to encapsulate all of the desirable optical qualities you’d get with a very good prime into a zoom.

      Previously, I wouldn’t have even considered shooting a zoom for anything really important, but this lens changed all that. Even the bokeh is pleasant and very usable.

      It’s great not having to lug 5 lenses around with me everywhere I go and risk getting dust on the sensor when I’m changing them. It’s also refreshing having the freedom to focus solely on the photography side of things without having to worry about the equipment.

      I’ve heard people call this lens heavy, and it’s no lie. It is is among the heavier ones I’ve used. You can feel the quality of its construction in it’s sheer density and mass. With the grip, it’s not badly balanced, but without it, I don’t know how I would manage it. That’s really the only caveat that comes with this lens that I’ve found so far – you’ve got to possess the strength to wield it.

      Autofocus is very fast on my A7rii, but insanely fast on the A7riii. the colors are very nice, a bit on the cool side, which I prefer, and contrast is excellent. It’s also a very sharp lens, even at f/2.8.

      I also own the 28-105mm G now and I’d say this one is a bit better optically, at least to my taste. If being able to push the bokeh further and having that extra 1.2 stops of light matters to you, I’d go with this one. If having the extra range and a slightly lighter lens is a top priority, then opt for the 70-105. Or you can always buy both of them, because they’re both amazing in their own ways. Lol

      The Opinionated Realist<span class="a-icon a-profile-verified-badge"><span class="a-profile-verified-text">

    6. John

      I’ll preface this by mentioning I mainly shoot people at night in dark places, not so much buildings or stars.
      This lens makes me want to get close to everything and leave the mammoth 70-200 at home. 16-35 GM is light and is everything you would expect from a g master lens, including a hefty price tag. I shoot live music mainly in lowlight while wide open. The autofocus is fast, but it will hunt if using a spot focal point along the edge of the frame just like every g master lens I own. No issues with eye autofocus. It’s amazing to see how many heads the camera recognizes in a crowded place at 16mm. The lens will cause barreling when angling the focal plane, but it’s easily controlled and can be used for different perspectives.
      Overall this lens is fast and sharp, can accommodate lens filters, and is light. It is expensive, but worth the investment if you can justify the jump to g master lenses.

      John

    7. Timmy

      A very good quality lens and should be for the price tag. The clarity is super and has good response time to autofocus. This will not be a good lens if you are trying to reach a far distance for sport’s photography, but if your camera has enough megapixels, you can crop without losing a lot of detail or image quality.

      Timmy

    8. Ted Price

      I just got the lens from Amazon Warehouse and it checks out alright. However, it didn’t come in original Sony brand box and instead came in a generic brown paper box instead, even though the description stated it would ship in original packaging.

      An hour long chat and phone call with Amazon would not produce the missing Sony brand box, it’s either return it or keep it as is. In the end I decided to keep it. This is the first time this happened to me as all prior “Like New” purchases came in original boxes. So for this specific lens, you will not get the original Sony brand box with your purchase.

      As for the lens itself, it’s functionally and optically OK but not much better than my Tamron 70-180mm in autofocus performance. Maybe my expectation was too high. So if you don’t need the 2X teleconverter capability, go with Sigma or Tamron equivalents and save big instead.

      Ted Price

    9. Drew

      While the size and cost of this lens can’t be ignored, the quality and versatility also stand out. I normally post pictures, but there are already tons of sample pictures out there.

      Pros
      – The image quality is excellent and paired with the A7RIII, I was able to get some really great shots
      – The build quality seems very sturdy, and my copy of the lens seems to be very good (which may speak to quality control by Sony)
      – The zoom ring is quite firm, which keeps the lens from creeping.
      – Nice to have the zoom lock feature when you need it
      – Nice and sharp wide open, and throughout the zoom range (You can see a difference wide open at the end of the zoom range, but the photos are still very good)
      – After shooting a little with this lens, and taking about 100 pictures, very few of them had any chromatic aberration. In post, I only needed to correct for this in a few photos.

      Cons
      – The size and weight are quite significant, and pretty much take away any size advantage that the mirror-less A7RIII might have had over another DSLR
      – The focus is by wire, so you don’t get the same smooth focus-ring feel.
      – While the A7RIII has IBIS, I would really like to see image stabilization here for the cost and size
      – Speaking of price… $$$

      Conclusion
      If you are looking for a pro lens, and don’t mind carrying it around, then this lens is great. Extremely sharp for a zoom and correcting any chromatic aberration, or lens distortion was easily handled in Lightroom. If you are looking to get a standard zoom for your Sony mirror-less, this is a great option.

      Drew

    10. flatpicker

      My first generation Sony 70-200 GM was my workhorse for many different kinds of photography for several years. I converted from Canon to Sony about six years ago, and used to rely similarly on the venerable Canon 70-200 L. I was delighted and impressed by the better performance of the Sony 70-200 after changing brands, and couldn’t imagine things getting much better. I was accordingly reluctant when Sony announced the 70-200 GM II–I didn’t think the marginal improvement possible could be worth the investment. The DXO ratings on the new 70-200 II eventually convinced me to take the plunge, and wow! I was surprised by the significant step-up in quality from the first time I used the new lens. I am mostly a sports shooter these days. I am routinely stunned by the increased resolution and focal accuracy of the new 70-200 II. The reduced weight, manual f-stop control, and additional IS controls are certainly niceties, but it’s image quality and reliability that’s critical to me. The new lens delivers, over and over again. I can routinely see individual eye-lashes and hairs on moving athletes captured at 200mm and 1/1000 across a gym or indoor arena, and images at ISO 4000+ have little or very manageable noise. I’m convinced the new II lens on a Sony A-1 becomes The Best Sports Camera In the World and have many images to prove it. And, of course, the combination does a great job with portraiture as well. Despite the expense, I’m very glad I stepped up from the I to the II. It is a significant and outstanding improvement.

      flatpicker

    No more offers for this product!
    0